Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Chief CRD's column >>

CHIEF CRD

Cool Rockin Daddy -
Articles Posted: 17  Links Seeded: 17
Member Since: 5/2010  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

One question you must answer honsetly - poll.

Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:42 PM EST
politics
By Chief CRD

Live Poll

View Results
  • 176575
    Yes, I can honestly look the future of our nation in the eye and say this
    31%
  • 176576
    No, I can't honestly look the future of our nation in the eye and say this.
    65%
  • 176577
    I don't care either way.
    4%

VoteTotal Votes: 49

Advertise | AdChoices

This question is a big one, the litmus test for our future.  No matter what side of the fence you sit on, no matter your beliefs, your leanings, your ideology, or non-ideology, this an important question you must ask yourself about the future of this nation.

Can you look your children (any kids, yours,or not, imagined or real) straight in the eye and honestly say to them"There are things I want the government to do now, but they can't afford it. So I want the government to borrow more money now and you will have to pay for it and very likely you will have much less of your own because of this."

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Chief CRD's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (72)
Chief CRD

While it is not the one most important question, it is a very important question. Coh please.

  • 6 votes
#1 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:44 PM EST
Zero-

no i can not. not as a soldier.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:31 PM EST
Mr. Roger Rabbit

This is not an apolitical questions, as you're trying to project it. The way your question is formulated implies an acknowledgement of the government's unabridged authority to do whatever they want, whenever they feel like it. I resent this implication, and I am sure you're not alone.

I can look my children in the eye and say - the government have screwed me in the past, and continues to do so in the present and in the future. So it befalls you my children, to take care of you, and your future families, keeping in mind that the government is not your friend, and will never be, unless you get a job in the government. The way you formulated your question you're supposing that we want the government to do something, when the truth is - we do not want the government to do anything, we want the government to leave people to their own devices, and leave people's money in their own discretion. In other words, beyond the absolute minimum - we do NOT want the government.

  • 7 votes
#1.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:40 PM EST
Coral Atlas

First your premise in the poll that investing in the future will result in a loss for future generations is false.

I can look my children in the eye and you the author as well and safely say the following:

"There are things I want the OUR government to MUST do now, but they can't we CAN afford it. So I want the government to borrow more money raise taxes on the wealthy now and you will NOT have to pay for it and very likely you will have much less MORE of your own because of this."

I would also add that it is due to the selfishness and greed of the few that the many suffer. ;-)

AND that OUR nation is NOT broke ... but just morally bankrupt!

  • 10 votes
#1.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:30 PM EST
I'm Ringo

due to the selfishness and greed

Of those that want something, and instead of paying for it want to force others to do so....which is something that any person with any sense of personal responsibility feels is

morally bankrupt

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:43 PM EST
Chief CRD

Coral, your statement is a valid one, but it is different than the question posed - two different scenarios. They are related, possibly connected, but still different. Don't change the question, because it is still one of many that needs to be answered.

  • 2 votes
#1.5 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:27 AM EST
JBURNS-1894015

You appear to be partial to the second scenario. As we have discovered over the last 3 years, our society also has to recognize a third scenario. That would be to bring the wealthy 1% in line with the 99% when determining the tax code. There is no way to distort the damage that has been done to this country as a result of tax loopholes. Corporations paying little to no taxes what so ever, crazy deductions only available to millionaires and billionaires.

I'm not really a person who wants to go back in time but, I do remember a world where it was a sense of pride to be an American. Everyone held hope for the future and were so driven to be the best. We functioned as a single society.

Some where along the line, our society has become so self absorbed. There is no respect for our President. Never has hatred been so intense as it is towards this man. We have nothing to be proud of. Many are angry because of the Bush/Cheney years and the cost of human lives because of a lie. Our President is trying to get the US out of the countries so quickly invaded.

The business model for this country has shifted to an open market where everyone has a chance to thriveand prosper. Now, "small business" owners no longer exist because we are now a society of bigger and bigger monopolies, eating its way through the economic policies that once promised every American an equal chance to move up in life.

We should have noticed what has been happening over the decades and put a stop to it. Anything in this country that has won the distinction as a "Too Big To Fail" entity needs to be broken. Slay the dragon, Bank of America, and bring back the neighborhood banks. The ability to work with known individuals rather than some wizard behind the curtain.

The longer we wait to gain back our perspectives and pride, the more we will loose and never be able to get back. All this haggling about deals with Oil Companies, Wall St hedge fundprofits, feeding the ever consuming dragon, will destroy us as a country. We need to once again invest in America and invest in our children's futures. Pretty pathetic to have the present group of leaders systematically screwing with our children. To mold America into their own image as if they were Gods of some elite race. They are not.

We certainly don't need some fire and brimstone preacher to declare what the approved religion of the US will be. We are a country founded to fight against religious persecution. Our Constitution makes a very clear distinction between Church and State. Don't muddy the waters with personal ideology. In America, everyone is entitled to their personal thoughts, religious beliefs, personal conscience and personal choice to live our lives without government intrusion. No one has the right to take those basic freedoms from us.

  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:34 PM EST
Mr. Roger Rabbit

I'm not really a person who wants to go back in time but, I do remember a world where it was a sense of pride to be an American. Everyone held hope for the future and were so driven to be the best. We functioned as a single society.

And that was a time where we did not beat on our millionaires and billionaires, we were hoping to become them. So please make a decision - are YOU part of that single society, where meritocracy rules, and hard-work, talent, and good old-fashioned luck can make you rich, or are you a proud member of the cry-baby army, where everything is the 1% fault, and you as people are responsbile for absolutely nothing.

  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:18 PM EST
Spikegary

Rabbit-

Agreed. The people who built and ran these businesses that have employed thousands and thousands of people don't deserve to be demonized. If we 'level the playing field' who will go out and find the next newest thing to make and build a business on?

  • 2 votes
#1.8 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:53 PM EST
Mr. Roger Rabbit

The playing field is level. It may not be polished down to a micron, but we do not have miles and mountains of injustice, outside of the ones we manage to create. You either have a brain and work-ethic, or you don't. It is that simple. If you are willing to put in the time, and have the capacity to comprehend - the life will be good, now if your talents are somewhat more limited - the future may not be as bright, but that is the point - not everyone is born capable of brain surgery. The important thing is to maintain upwards mobility, and provide a respectable but minimalistic (as in nowhere near equal) standard of living for those less fortunate. Oh, yeah, and before I forget - drill, baby, drill.

  • 5 votes
#1.9 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:56 PM EST
Spikegary

I started at the bottom in my career and have worked my way up-I live comfortably. Thta's how it should be done-very few get to start at the top, though many feel they deserve that. Life is a learning process. We're not born with everything we need to know about our chosen field.

I once thought I deserved more (as a young, young adult) but learned you advance with knowledge, skills and abilities and personality. Thta has served me well as an adult.

  • 7 votes
#1.10 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:07 AM EST
Mr. Roger Rabbit

Hmm, I do not recall did we ever agree before?

I want to point out and interesting line in your post - you said that as a young person you felt you "deserved" things, and later you learned that things are "earned" as opposed to given. It seems to me that this particular concept is somehow missing from the current education curriculum.

  • 7 votes
#1.11 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:17 AM EST
SCTexan

you said that as a young person you felt you "deserved" things, and later you learned that things are "earned" as opposed to given. It seems to me that this particular concept is somehow missing from the current education curriculum.

Wonder if that would ever work as a political slogan......................na...............

  • 2 votes
#1.12 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:23 AM EST
Another Colonel

Nope...won't steal from the kids....

  • 3 votes
#1.13 - Wed Apr 4, 2012 3:06 PM EDT
stally

Coral, your statement is a valid one, but it is different than the question posed - two different scenarios. They are related, possibly connected, but still different. Don't change the question, because it is still one of many that needs to be answered.

Sorry, but your question is misleading, inaccurate and therefore dishonest. You're assuming only two scenerios and there are a lot more. I can look at my loved ones and tell them that I want the government to invest in their future. I want to make sure that they have the potential for the life I had. I want my loved ones to be educated and cared for. If the government needs to borrow to make sure that we can do that then so be it. If my kids are 10 times better off then does it matter if they have to pay 50% more taxes?

Any business man knows it takes money to make money, and it's easy to be a penny wise and pound foolish. So your question is far too simplistic and therefore misleading.

    #1.14 - Wed Apr 4, 2012 3:26 PM EDT
    Chief CRD

    If my kids are 10 times better off then does it matter if they have to pay 50% more taxes?

    Who are you to decide that for them? How do you know they will be 10 times better off and paying 50% taxes as middle class citizens? By the way, that is socialism, ask anyone who came from a former iron curtain nation or just do the math.

    The problem is that too many people like you are saying it's OK to rob our children of their future because you want the government to give you stuff right now. But - it's not the government's job to give you that stuff - giving you that stuff has nothing to do with actually running the country. It's your responsibility to go out and earn it. We do not live in a nanny state.

    If you want to rob your kids of a future, I don't have a problem with that. But you want so much from Uncle Sam, that you are robbing your kids, the kids across the street, the kids across town and MY kids. And when you hurt MY kids, it doesn't make me happy.

    • 3 votes
    #1.15 - Thu Apr 5, 2012 8:18 AM EDT
    stally

    Who are you to decide that for them? How do you know they will be 10 times better off and paying 50% taxes as middle class citizens?

    I believe that's the definition of a parent. I try my best to make decisions for my child that will make them better off in the future.

    By the way, that is socialism, ask anyone who came from a former iron curtain nation or just do the math.

    When I hear someone use the term socialism I know I am talking to someone who is dogmatic and irrational. These are meaningless Pavlovian terms meant to derive a response. The truth is you cannot have a government without introducing socialism into the picture, because once you have a government, especially a Democratic Government, then you have something that is owned by the people. America has succeeded not because it was a capitalist society, but because it's been able to find balance between commerce and it's social responsibility. Social responsibility is not about morality, it's about keeping the peace. Every revolution has started because people felt neglected.

    The problem is that too many people like you are saying it's OK to rob our children of their future because you want the government to give you stuff right now.

    Wrong, this is a different question. This is asking how I want the money to be spent. I want the money to be spent investing in our future. I want it invested in education, protecting our resources, building our infrastructure and creating the jobs we need to get people off of welfare. I want to build America back to the nation it was when I was a kid.

    If you want to rob your kids of a future, I don't have a problem with that. But you want so much from Uncle Sam, that you are robbing your kids, the kids across the street, the kids across town and MY kids. And when you hurt MY kids, it doesn't make me happy.

    It all depends on how you spend that money. Again, the old adage penny wise pound foolish comes to mine. You are robbing your kids of their future when you deny them education, you deny them a healthy environment and you deny them the basic liberties and "entitlements" you grew up with.

      #1.16 - Thu Apr 5, 2012 9:21 AM EDT
      UNA_Lion

      I believe that's the definition of a parent. I try my best to make decisions for my child that will make them better off in the future.

      Ah yes, I ran into parents like you all the time when assigned to Recruiting Command. A 19-year-old man or woman would want to enlist, only to be overruled by the parents who knew better for them. My generation is entirely too arrogant, selfish, and controlling of their kids. When I turned 18, I left my parents' home and didn't look back, as did a great many in my generation. Is it any wonder we have a generation of 35-year-old "kids" still dependent upon their parents for nearly everything?

      Now place that on a grander scale: We know what's better for those who will follow us, which is why we will run up the debt like it's going out of style. And Social Security? Heck, we're good out to at least 2032 or there abouts. What of generations who follow us? Who cares, we got ours, so figure it out later once the bill comes due - daddy and mommy knows best!

      • 2 votes
      #1.17 - Thu Apr 5, 2012 9:46 AM EDT
      Chief CRD

      When I hear someone use the term socialism I know I am talking to someone who is dogmatic and irrational.

      Like I said, talk to a person who is from a former iron curtain country, somebody who came here in the late 20th century after growing up in a place like Hungary, Poland or Romania. They lived it, they know it, they see it here. What I'm saying is not dogmatic and irrational - it is the truth.

      Wrong, this is a different question.

      No, same question.

      I want it invested in education, protecting our resources, building our infrastructure and creating the jobs we need to get people off of welfare.

      The problem is, not everyone sees it that way. They want welfare, they want the government to give them what they are "entitled" to. We don't need to spend astronomical amounts of taxpayers money on everything- just the much smaller correct amount of money on the correct things. Guaranteed - if we cut spending PROPERLY, we don't need to raise taxes and it won't hurt us or our children, just the lazy bums with their hands out clamoring for "nanny" to take care of them instead of going out and earning something.

      • 2 votes
      #1.18 - Thu Apr 5, 2012 11:16 AM EDT
      stally

      Like I said, talk to a person who is from a former iron curtain country, somebody who came here in the late 20th century after growing up in a place like Hungary, Poland or Romania. They lived it, they know it, they see it here. What I'm saying is not dogmatic and irrational - it is the truth.

      Purity fails; whether it’s pure socialism or pure capitalism. The US does not have pure capitalism nor does it have pure socialism. It's also not an oligarchy. So your point is irrelevant since we don’t even have anything even approaching an analogy. However, I would point out that one thing that all repressive regimes have had in common is that they were typically oligarchies or monarchies. If you want to be scared of something be scared of that. Be scared of a single group, whether it be Christians, Corporations, Liberals, Conservatives, Republicans or Democrats taking over. When balance is disrupted bad things happen.

      The problem is, not everyone sees it that way. They want welfare, they want the government to give them what they are "entitled" to.

      Of course everyone doesn’t see it the same way. With 7 billion people on the planet it’s inevitable. I didn’t answer the question for them, I answered it for me. My answer is Yes I am willing to put some debt on my children as long as that debt has a positive effect on their future.

      We don't need to spend astronomical amounts of taxpayers money on everything- just the much smaller correct amount of money on the correct things.

      Agreed, but that could still get us into debt. What you're talking about is spending your money wisely. Going into debt might be a wise financial decision.

      Guaranteed - if we cut spending PROPERLY, we don't need to raise taxes and it won't hurt us or our children,

      No that's not guaranteed. If for instance my child had a treatable illness that would only progress over time if left untreated, I WOULD endanger my child. If I don't propery educate my child because I am afraid to raise taxes, then I sacrificed his future. If I don't wisely fund agencies to make sure my childs drinking water is safe then my child my suffer permanent injury because I was too cheap to invest in their future. In fact saying you don't want to pay taxes is just as greedy as those who want entitlements. Taking money from the government is exactly the same as not paying the government for services rendered. It's just as greedy.

      Our children have already incurred debt. They have incurred this debt because we as a nation were robbed by Wall Street which was enabled by our Government. Wall Street and Government officials worked hand in hand to create this problem. Now they want us to pay for their f*** up. They say WE should tighten our belts and give up the services that we once all took for granted, because THEY robbed us. That's what they are stealing from OUR children and when you defend them you are complicit in the crime.

      The Tea Party is somewhat right about Government, while OWS is somewhat right about corporations. Both of them have 1/2 the problem, but stupid radical ideology keeps them from realize that they are looking at different sides of the same coin.

      just the lazy bums with their hands out clamoring for "nanny" to take care of them instead of going out and earning something.

      When those “lazy bums” got too repressed, they became unlazy and that's the way revolution starts. Read about the causes of the French Revolution, The Communist Revolution, The Nazi Revolution and even the American Revolution. You will see the term “lazy bums” used a lot by a repressive elite. It’s an ignorant and dangerous statement and always ends up badly.

        #1.19 - Thu Apr 5, 2012 12:17 PM EDT
        Reply
        Queenie of the castle

        No, I cannot essentially rip the "American Dream" out from under our future generations. There is no logical reason that our country cannot be self-supportive, and at the same time, not saddle future generations with a tax liability and national debt that even the most uber-rich will not be able to fathom.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#2 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:38 PM EST
        Chief CRD

        It leads to another question - one directed at the generations before us: Why did you do it to us?

        • 6 votes
        Reply#3 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:45 PM EST
        Zero-

        if i may answer for my grandfather. he would say "its the fault of the adverge citizen for electing the idiots who run our country"

        • 9 votes
        #3.1 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:59 PM EST
        Chief CRD

        BINGO! People who are too cowardly to think for themselves so they latch onto the party line, firmly believing every lie that is put forth.

        • 7 votes
        #3.2 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:09 PM EST
        Zero-

        this is why he never voted he believed both partys were wrong

        • 3 votes
        #3.3 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:17 PM EST
        FlNutmegger

        It leads to another question - one directed at the generations before us: Why did you do it to us?

        You can not hang this on anyone except yourselves. If you ask your parents, or grandparents, what their lives were like then, as the norm, the details will turn your hair white. They/we lived with conditions that current generations could never endure. All of the niceties that you all figure as entitlements did not even exist during our childhoods. Going to work at 11 years of age was common place even in my generation so I would counter your question, looking you all straight in the eyes, and ask; What have you done with all that we have provided you in the ways of comforts which we never enjoyed and you have through our efforts. What would you have us do for you now that you have squandered all that we suffered so greatly to provide for you?

        • 9 votes
        #3.4 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:23 PM EST
        kazutam

        What would you have us do for you now that you have squandered all that we suffered so greatly to provide for you?

        Great reply.

        • 2 votes
        #3.5 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:16 PM EST
        Chief CRD

        If you ask your parents,...

        You mean those that grew up during the 60's and 70s? A time when people turned against moral values and common decency? Many of those people are the parents of people (or people) I work with now. No moral values, no work ethic, no manners - and they pass this off to their kids, along with the idea that the government owes them something. My parents and grandparents worked hard for what they have, they grew up with a good work ethnic, moral values and a sense of contributing to the future of this nation by instilling these values in their children. My grandparents would turn in their graves if they could see how far in debt this nation is now, how poorly it has been led by the last few administrations. They would ask who the idiots are that let this happen. But the hippie generation doesn't care, and they pass that lazy ethic to their offspring.
        FNUtmegger - ask these people what they will do now that they have squandered all that you worked so hard to provide. There are those of us who worked hard to not squander it.

        • 3 votes
        #3.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:38 AM EST
        FlNutmegger

        Chief CRD:, FNUtmegger - ask these people what they will do now that they have squandered all that you worked so hard to provide. There are those of us who worked hard to not squander it.

        You are the exception to the rule, here, and I am grateful that there folks such as your self, too. You picked the exact time, IMO, when this started to go into the toilet. The time of "Do not trust anyone older that yourself. Challenge ever rule of law and only follow those that you agree with. Protest all governmental rulings that you do not agree with." It has been all down hill from there to where we are today and where folks such as yourself are, as I said, the exceptions, and in the minority! I am old, and from the generations of either your Parents, or mostly Grandparents, and this adventure for me is nearly over and none too soon, either.

        • 3 votes
        #3.7 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:46 AM EST
        formerstew

        Going to work at 11 years of age was common place even in my generation so I would counter your question, looking you all straight in the eyes, and ask; What have you done with all that we have provided you in the ways of comforts which we never enjoyed and you have through our efforts. What would you have us do for you now that you have squandered all that we suffered so greatly to provide for you?

        Late to the party, I know...but this is the kind of spankin' I like to see given. Fab response, FIN.

        • 3 votes
        #3.8 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:30 AM EST
        FlNutmegger

        Thank you, formerstew, I am able to attest to that since I am one of those who started working at 11 and never stopped through war and peace until forced to by cancer.

        • 3 votes
        #3.9 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:04 AM EST
        Reply
        Spikegary

        I can't. As someone that works for the government, I understand that now is the time to cut back. This administration has been busy insourcing jobs-making more government jobs at the expense of contract jobs. We can't keep spending more with no way to pay for it. All of us will have to suffer-everyone, but I think this is the only way to get a hold of this monster we call government.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#4 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:34 PM EST
        TERESA OLEARY

        I believe that the borrowing that we have accrued to date, both in Europe and the US, is as a result of a belief that, economically, we were indestructable. We believed our manufucturing industries ruled the World, and the returns would always provide the cash-cow to fund our Western lifestyles, providing more and more "cushions" for the population. Infrastructure improved because of massive investment which accrued more and more borrowing, and the public sector grew bigger as more Institutions sprung up.

        Now, we have to compete with cheaper labour and growing manufacturing in China and India - losing more and more of our industrial and manufacturing competitiveness. Also, Big Business closing factories and moving them out of our borders to take advantage of cheaper labour abroad (you know the story, so I won't dwell) - the reliance on that future bloated Cash Cow now looks more like a Lean Calf. So - how are we, in Western economies, going pay back all that borrowing? How are we going to take back all that the citizens were given and, seemingly, set in concrete?

        Our Governments all spent massive amounts over our countrys' GDPs - never really thinking that those export incomes would shrink. We seemed, at that time, invincible.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#5 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:53 PM EST
        Katheryn Brandy

        Okay - to balance this discussion. I would say yes, that there may be things that must be done today to safe guard our nation that we have to borrow from the future to pay for.

        Are we in that position currently? Probably not.

        To put it on a more human/personal level - if my child or spouse were sick and needed a treatment or surgery to survive,I would put myself/my child in debt to ensure their future health.

        But would I put my child's future in jeopardy to pay for a bigger house on the assumption I'll win the lottery -no.

        I just don't think questions like that are black or white.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#6 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:26 PM EST
        Chief CRD

        Your point is well taken. The problem is, we do not need to put ourselves into such debt to ensure our future health, in fact, it's the other way around. Obama has been standing in line at the local quick mart to get the nation's power ball tickets every night since he got elected...

        • 5 votes
        #6.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:55 PM EST
        Katheryn Brandy

        While I don't agree with you - I do love your example!

        • 2 votes
        #6.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:12 PM EST
        SCTexan

        nation's power ball tickets every night since he got elected...

        I've been saying for years that we need a national lottery and apply all revenues to the debt until it is retired. I'd bet we'd pay it off in less than 10 years. Plus it is a hidden tax on the stupid.

        • 6 votes
        #6.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:31 PM EST
        Katheryn Brandy

        oh yeah,SCTexan - because I swear - people may not have two dimes to rub together, but they sure as hell will buy a lottery ticket.

        Of course you do realize, as soon as you get a little surplus in there, the same people who got us into debt will start to "borrow" the funds to pay for other stuff.(at least in my state that's how it's been)

        • 5 votes
        #6.4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:40 PM EST
        TERESA OLEARY

        Hah.. that's what it has been like in my Country (the UK)... The State pension fund became the Cash Cow over the decades, and now we struggle to fund current pensions. Not sure, to date, how many hundreds of millions is currently the shortfall - too scared to look...!

        • 2 votes
        #6.5 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:28 PM EST
        SCTexan

        Katheryn, if we write the law such that the collected revenue goes immediately to pay down the debt, then once we have it paid off, then I'm open to setting a rainy day fund, say a couple of trillion, then what's left, let do stuff with it. We could lower taxes on income (if not totally eliminate it) and do all the infrastructure work our hearts desire.

        • 2 votes
        #6.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:55 AM EST
        Katheryn Brandy

        SCTexan -You have my vote

        • 1 vote
        #6.7 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:05 PM EST
        Reply
        kazutam

        No, I can't say this.

        Sad as it is to say the "feel good" policies of the past few DECADES have brought us to this point.

        The "social engineering" that our government has sponsored and participated in, the role of "world policeman" that has been put in place that many in our government eagerly sought after, the attempts to "buy" popularity world-wide with foreign aid, the giving away of the technologies that were developed here. The total and complete ignoring of the illegal immigration problem(INCLUDING the failed amnesty of Reagan), the trillions spent on the "drug war".

        ALL of these things have led us to this point, and we are now at a point where there is going to be "pain" no matter what is done.

        So IMO it's time to "take the pain" and "take our medicine" and cut back.

        To continue the way that the government has been going racking up debt is frankly insane. If this was your "average Joe Blow" doing this with their personal household budget EVERYONE would agree that it is totally irresponsible. If it was a business/CEO doing this the opinion would be the same. I'm sorry and I know that many do NOT want to hear the actual truth, but you simply can not spend your way out of debt, and that appears to be what has been decided to be tried by those who hold office in this country.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#7 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:28 PM EST
        FlNutmegger

        So IMO it's time to "take the pain" and "take our medicine" and cut back.

        Point is very well taken but, here comes tha terrible but again, as a very old participating observer to most of what has happened in the past as well as now, and the future, The ones making the nasty noises now about having to share the pain are the very ones who have gained the most and are not now willing to pay the piper so to speak.

        • 4 votes
        #7.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:36 PM EST
        kazutam

        FlN

        Well since I'm now in my 50's, I have watched this going on for quite a while now. I've been working and paying in for over 35 years now.

        I KNOW that when retirement time rolls around for me there is going to be nothing left of social security.

        So YES I am already planning to work until the day that I take that long dirt nap.

        Personally I don't want to see my grandchildren any more obligated than they are already, a state that CAN be fixed by taking the pain NOW rather than kicking the can down the road.

        To be completely honest it would save this country a good chunk of money to re-evaluate all of the folks running around collecting social security disability checks currently. Those that are actually disabled and have gotten that way from working need that safety net.

        But those who have never worked a day in their life, but have some sort of "disability" that is in all honesty just "gaming the system"(such as a speech impediment, or ADHD, or drug addiction) NEED to be re-evaluated and retrained to be productive, rather than being leeches.

        A purging of the rolls will also catch all of the illegals that are currently collecting benefits(YES they are out there) and will in the long run save money.

        The short-sighted "feel good" policies such as the "payroll tax holiday", that decrease the contributions into these programs that are currently breaking the country need to stop.

        • 3 votes
        #7.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:08 PM EST
        TERESA OLEARY

        Anyone heard of the politicians taking a pay cut yet? Pensions? Expenses? - No, did'nt think so. However, we are all supposed to be in this together - oh, except the politicians - right, I see.

        • 4 votes
        #7.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:34 PM EST
        SCTexan

        I think that our politicians should not get any retirement benefits. Go, serve the country, then go back to work. Congress should not be a career. The only one that I'd consider a pension for would be the President, and that would be only if he/she wasn't a multi-millionaire.

        • 2 votes
        #7.4 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:57 AM EST
        TERESA OLEARY

        Well, I am just wondering if those in Congress are somehow immune from austerity measures - across the whole range of their very generous packages, and when will this actually enter the arena. Same applies to EU politicians, and their no-limit expense accounts on top of very generous benefits and salaries. If I hear anything, I will post - but, so far, deafening silence!!

        • 2 votes
        #7.5 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:11 AM EST
        FlNutmegger

        Kazutam, Please forgive my delay here but it takes a bit more time for me now. I shall try to do this by degrees since what you are saying here is so important that I would not want to let any of it get by.

        I am 87 and paid into it until I was forced into retirement at 65, by cancer, and was not ready to retire then but………..

        The Social Security fund, and its promises to the workers paying for it, will never be allowed to fail because the same politicians who raided it to fund their pet projects on the backs of the working public know that that would indeed be reaping the harvest of the seeds of revolution that they have sown. It is for their benefit that they keep the pot boiling on the idea that SS funds will not be there. The full strength of the Treasury is pledged in keeping the Fund solvent and if they fail in that then the United States will be in default of all of its financial obligations the world over. There will be modifications and I am just not smart enough to know what they will be or when they will take place but the Fund will be kept solvent. What is most distressing though is that people are blaming the existing seniors for having lived too long and siphoning off money that they feel is theirs and not being paid to the people who earned it instead of the politicians who have continuously raided this fund since Lyndon Johnson and his battery of lawyers found a way to raid it for his supposed Greater Society fiasco. Are you aware for instance that all funding for the safety nets they brag about as entitlements such as Unemployment Compensation draw their fund directly from the SS Fund? SSDI recipients some of whom have never worked a day in their life but draw a monthly check from the basic SS Fund. Food Stamps, Rent assistance, all sorts of assistance given, and the operative word there is given, draw there funding from the SS Fund and all so the politicians can say that they gave you something without adding to our national debt when in fact they are stealing it from you and all like you.

        We can never foresee what is in our future and as far as the dirt nap is concerned at a point in time (trust me here) the nap looks more and more inviting.

        In order that this be as painless for the people who ultimately pay all of the bills, now and in the future, it would behoove this country to start looking inward towards the financial health and well being of its own citizens. Your grandchildren should in no way be responsible for the almost total irresponsibility of our current leaders and their ego building dreams of glory.

        A good way to start this evaluation is considering our foreign aid to countries who hate us but which our government officials are buying off with no hope of return on the investment of your Grandchildren’s futures. Kicking the can down the road is a hopeless endeavor for us the taxpayers but greases the egos of those whom we elect to protect our best interests and have failed miserably. Played a lot of Kick the Can back during the depression but this is not the time or the place for that.

        I have found by observing the results of some of our federal agencies that they need to be shaken up big time as to just what their responsibilities are when dealing with the financial problems of this nation. Having our Federal Government as the single largest employer says nothing for them that is good. I have found many instances where once the initial finding is made concerning an individual’s rights to assistance that they never review their findings for accuracy. The general feeling there is ignore it because we can always get more money and this is only one individual or instance when in reality combining these instances and we find hundreds of thousands of them and costing billions. What will come to be, IMO, is that these people who have been gaming the system will have to be purged from the system in order for it to survive. Hard choices will be ultimately made, and there will indeed be violence and a lot of people are going to be hurt. Your evaluation of this situation is dead on. This reminds me of the time when Reagan pushed to have all of the people who were in truth being warehoused in institutions around the country and paid for by taxpayer monies to be released back into the mainstream of society. The resulting thousands o homeless people needing professional help that had been getting it was and is a disaster and he pushed for it most to help those poor people but to save the states money and they wound up homeless since the mainstream citizens could not care for them the way they needed and Reagan accomplished what he set out to do and that was close down all of those institutions but at a terrible human toll.

        In order that we rid ourselves of that particular cancer our government is going to have to tell Mexico, and I mean tell, that unless they do something on their side of the border we intend to arm it. The Mexican government is even more corrupt that ours if that is possible. I can’t get too deeply involved with this subject or my response will never end. Suffice is to say that I am a believer in law and order and the rule of law. We have people in these countries whom I describe as treasonous enablers actively aiding them and which ultimately will destroy this county and who just do not seem to care one whit. The problems they have come here to escape are the problems of the country they left not ours. Sending them back wou8ld force their home countries to either address those problems or continue to ignore the suffering of their citizens which again is not the problem of this country or its legal citizens. The fastest way for this to be brought under control is to enforce the E-identify laws already on the books and confiscate, as well as, prosecute the owners and send them to prison for a mandatory sentence. My feeling is that our President, whom I voted for, by the way, in pandering to a vocal minority to gain their votes, has broken not only the laws of the land but more importantly his Oath of Office. This could gone on for pages but I am sure that this alone will bring down the wrath of the enablers on my head but I am just too old and secure in the knowledge that I am right so I do not care much.

        I shall end this here and do hope that you took the time to read it all for your questions and feeling are very important and need some sort of response from me.

        • 2 votes
        #7.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:17 AM EST
        kazutam

        FlN

        Thank you for your response.

        I'm glad to see that I am not the only one who sees these problems.

        As far as the whole SS benefit, well I have watched mine go down over the years. I say that as I get a mailing every few years that lays out what my benefits would be based upon my earnings. About 8 or 9 years ago that benefit would have been around $1500 a month. Since that time it has dropped considerably down to around $850 a month. I have not stopped working even though my earning dropped some.

        So like I stated before I just plan on working until I drop, because that benefit/safety net has been cut out from under me by those who have raided the system to use the money for other things.

        As far as the whole southern border deal, I think that there should be some charges brought against every president(or ex) who is still alive that let it get to this point, along with the same thing for congressional members(current or ex), as they have FAILED miserably in their duty to protect this country. I know there are plenty on here who will argue this point with me, but I consider this to be an invasion when there are MILLIONS of folks here illegally.

        • 2 votes
        #7.7 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:34 PM EST
        Reply
        SCTexan

        We pay somewhere around $500b each year in interest on the debt. I propose that we rework the tax system, lowering rates but eliminating loopholes/deductions, cut service to the minimum and pay down the debt. Once it gets either paid off or well in the comfortable range to pay off, then we have $500b plus to spend on the American public. Shoot, that might even cover our health care issue.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#8 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:51 PM EST
        "TKS the Engineer"

        Some of that's a good idea... most programs are cut to the bone as it is. What the feds don't provide, the states are usually mandated to make up for so in many ways they've got you coming and going.

        The other problem is - paying off the debt isn't necessarily the most important thing. We need to make sure we're still an america we recognize and that we don't lose our competitive edge any more than we already have. We can't have an america that only works for the rich and middle class - if we're going to be competitive, we need to get everyone to participate.

        Also, keep in mind that any GOP alternative (the Ryan plan for instance) didn't do anything for the debt. The only difference in the national debt between obamas proposal and ryans was that after 10 years, obama has $22 trillion and ryan had $20-$21 trillion... And a what cost? Ryan destroys the middle class safety net and cuts taxes for the wealthy further increasing the divide between rich and poor in this country... not to mention what it would do to environment regulations and education - all for a couple trillion and still adding to the deficit? No Deal!

        • 1 vote
        #8.1 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:21 PM EST
        FlNutmegger

        Everybody is hung up on cutting programs that help our middle class and the poorest amongst us and I see and hear no one addressing cutting out our Foreign Aid. When we do that then we might just find that the money we are throwing away overseas could help those amongst us who need it the most.

        • 1 vote
        #8.2 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:30 PM EST
        "TKS the Engineer"

        Not that I don't agree with your point about the middle class bt foreign aid is a zit on the ass of the federal budget

          #8.3 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:50 PM EST
          FlNutmegger

          You must be one of those 1% I keep reading. and hearing. about but this looks to me to be one hell of a lot bigger than a zit on an elephants ass (your words). This looks as $52,700,000,000.00 and I can sure buy a bunch of better living than I have now with this zit instead of giving it to some foreigner who doesn't give a crap about me, for sure.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_foreign_aid

          Total economic and military assistance: $52.7 billion

          Total military assistance: $15.0 billion

          Total economic assistance: $37.7 billion

          • 2 votes
          #8.4 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:14 PM EST
          "TKS the Engineer"

          I'm certainly not a 1%-type a$$hole. You have to count the zeros and understand scale of our expendiures...

          $52.7 Billion is a lot, but the federal government spends $3,600,000,000,000 (Yes, that's a TRILLION) dollars a year.

          The aid is approximately 1.5% of that entire number... and it's only about 0.3% of our total national debt.

          Cutting it out completely would only get us 5% closer to balancing the annual budget deficit

          I'd call that a zit on the ass of a huge problem. And when you think about how much money that saves us in dealing with other armed conflicts/humanitarian disasters and general good will among nations, it is totally worth it.

          Now should some countries like Pakistan not get it, sure - but it's far from what's actually breaking the back of this country and we're all probably better off for it

            #8.5 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:14 PM EST
            FlNutmegger

            In your personal opinion, which I respect, but do not agree with, since the peoples that we are supporting would gladly see us dead, if they could. Speaking of armed conflicts, it was a beauty that got us to where we are today, with our warm and fuzzy feelings, I know because I was there for pretty much all of it, as the world's protector which is what we created the United Nations for and which they refuse to do after the forgotten War of Korea where we are still on station without any of the nations who by signing the charter agreed to be and yet have all bailed out. Why is that do you suppose? Too many ill advised people are worrying about what the future might bring when it is our present that is in jeopardy and not from any outside potential enemy but from within an people who refuse to recognize a clear and present danger when it is right under their noses.

            • 3 votes
            #8.6 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:43 PM EST
            Reply
            Coral Atlas

            This thread appears somewhat incestuous as far as "related" opinions are concerned ...... no mention of the wealth gap and the decline of the middle class coinciding with union busting .... no mention of the neglect of public school education which fosters the growth of a lower class consisting of the middle class as well ....

            no mention of the failed trickle down policies since Reagan that have resulted in massive abuses by the corpocracy aka banks, credit card companies and securities brokers ...

            no consideration of the cost of pollution caused by corporations who prefer more profit to clean air and water ...

            no understanding of the economics that forces workers to work longer for less pay while those who employ them make more money, THEN buy politicians and profit even more from wars and the industrial-military complex and THEN lend OUR taxes back to us at excessive interest rates so we can buy what we need to live from them and start the whole cycle all over again!!!!

            Wake up Americans.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#9 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:41 PM EST
            Y Lee Coyote

            you load sixteen tons and what do you get?

            another day older and deeper in debt...

            I owe my soul to the company store.

            • 1 vote
            #9.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:59 PM EST
            Reply
            "TKS the Engineer"

            This is such a loaded question for the following reasons:

            1) We mortgaged our children's and grandchildren's future long ago with our national debt. When it was 5 trillion and Clinton left us with a surplus for the first time in 30 years, we could envision paying it back... Then, George Bush started 2 preemptive wars, passed a medicare prescription drug benefit with no way of paying for it, cut taxes while fighting two wars (for some reason), and allowed unchecked greed, deregulation and malfeasance to cause the biggest financial crisis since the great depression. When he left, he handed billions in taxpayer grants to the auto industry, saddled us with 10 trillion in debt and had no solutions in place for job losses to the tune of 700,000/month... If you think our great-grandchildren won't be saddled with our debt, no matter what we do now, you're living in a fantasy land

            2) You pre-suppose that nation debt is the biggest problem our future generations will face. That is BS. If we cut the safety net and cut education and government funding for R&D, we can't have any expectation that we'll be a competitive, well-educated and vibrant workforce that can compete in a global economy dominated by developing countries with terrible labor practices and loose environmental regulations... By not spending you now you will be dooming future generations to fail in that environment.

            I don't want to look a child in the eye and tell them that you couldn't have the benefits and protections your grandparents had because we spent it all and mismanaged it. I don't want to say that you won't be given a top-notch education and receive adequate health care and food, and housing because we ran up the debt to much years ago...

            The only people who will be able to pay off that debt is out grandchildren and our great-grandchildren - the worst thing in the world we can do now is to pull the rug out from under them and let them deal with our mistakes without preparation. We need them all to be educated and innovative because they need to get the jobs and make the money to get us out of this mess... and if they're spending money repairing roads 30 years from now that should have been done now - that's a failure... It's a failure of leadership. We need to think about the future - and understand that its OK to leverage the power america still wields in the world to run up that debt and make smart investments now...

            It is the only way, and the GOP is advocating the opposite idea... They're pushing for an america in decline where our best days are behind us and the very rich benefit while more working and middle class become poor. Wake Up! We need to build the america we want our kids to live in and give them the tools and the ability to tackle the problems we've left for them... it is the only way.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#10 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:14 PM EST
            northern girl

            I could not look my child in the eye and say that. I might just as well look at him and say "Im selfish and want things I cant afford, so too bad so sad, you're gonna pay for them". Nope, sorry, cant do it!

            • 6 votes
            Reply#11 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:57 AM EST
            FlNutmegger

            Nope, northern girl, you or I could not do that in good conscience, and the operatives are good conscience but our elected official can and do every day as they continue to loot the treasury! How do they do that? Since their collective consciences have been bought and paid for it is safe to say that they have no consciences.

            • 2 votes
            #11.1 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:19 PM EST
            Reply
            1eachBENNIS

            -If spent wisely, yeah? Not gambles, investments with a high probability of success. Horse, there is the water...

            • 1 vote
            Reply#12 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:48 PM EST
            Borncorn

            Maybe the reason we can't afford it, is that we have the lowest tax rates in my lifetime, and I'm 60. Maybe we actually can afford it if we would just go back to the tax rates prior to Reagan, or at least, the rates under Clinton. The reason our parents generation could afford things was that they were not afraid to tax the rich.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#13 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:24 AM EST
            SCTexan

            http://www.deptofnumbers.com/misc/debt-revenue-and-expenditures-as-a-fraction-of-gdp/

            Maybe the reason we can't afford it, is that we have the lowest tax rates in my lifetime

            The tax rate is a farce, it's how much money we are collecting into the government coffers that matters. The first time we collected more than 20% of GDP in tax revenues was in 1998 (tech bubble). Once the bubble popped we dropped back into 18% to 19% levels - same since 1947.

            Basically, we are collecting the same percent of tax revenues to GDP as we have in modern times. Spending on the other hand has gone from 15% to 25%. So, if historically we collect 19% of GDP in taxes, then our spending needs to be 19% or a cut of 6%, now.

            Since we collect the same percent of revenue and the ones who are actually paying the bill is a smaller set of people, then the percent paid by the "rich" is much higher than anytime in history.

            • 3 votes
            Reply#14 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:44 AM EST
            Borncorn

            The tax rate is a farce, it's how much money we are collecting into the government coffers that matters.

            And a higher tax rate means we would collect more. If the rate is such as farce, why would you care if it was raised?

            • 1 vote
            Reply#15 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:07 PM EST
            SCTexan

            Because the government receives the same percentage of tax dollars from the economy it has historically, that should be enough.

            • 3 votes
            #15.1 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:00 PM EST
            Borncorn

            I'm more in line with Warren Buffett on this one. Government spending is a counter cyclical need for the business cycle. And we need both revenues and cutting expenses to tackle this deficit in the long run. GDP will increase with the economy.

            • 1 vote
            #15.2 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:29 PM EST
            SCTexan

            GDP will increase with the economy.

            and so will tax revenues. IMO the explosion of spending vs GDP is what is driving the deficit, not tax revenue. If we held spending to...say 17% during good times and 21% in bad, then in the long run we'd break even.

            • 2 votes
            #15.3 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:59 PM EST
            Reply
            Borncorn

            Government spending isn't hurting the economy. It might not be the right thing to do, but it had nothing to do with the recession.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#16 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:46 PM EST
            Chief CRD

            Looking at the pool results so far, I could never imagine how many people are so selfish that they would actually screw their own kids out of a good future.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#17 - Wed Apr 4, 2012 1:24 PM EDT
            kazutam

            Sad isn't it?

            Of course we see that same type of attitude concerning all kinds of things going on in this country.

            It boils down to spoiled little brats throwing a temper tantrum screaming "I want (fill in the blank) and I want someone else to pay for it".

            • 4 votes
            #17.1 - Wed Apr 4, 2012 1:32 PM EDT
            Reply
            UNA_Lion

            Excellent poll! Just how much pain and suffering are we prepared to hand off to following generations in the name of our own selfishness?

            • 4 votes
            Reply#18 - Wed Apr 4, 2012 3:39 PM EDT
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
            Newsvine Privacy Statement
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            FUN STUFF:
            • Leaderboard |
            • E-Mail Alerts |
            • Top of the Vine |
            • Newsvine Live |
            • Newsvine Archives |
            • The Greenhouse |
            COMPANY STUFF:
            • Code of Honor |
            • Company Info |
            • Contact Us |
            • Jobs |
            • User Agreement |
            • Privacy Policy |
            • About our ads
            LEGAL STUFF:
            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com